I watched the fascinating interview between torture cheerleader Marc Thiessen and Jon Stewart on The Daily Show this week. It's a fascinating look into the mind of the pro-torture crowd, illustrating how hollow their tough talk is considering how much they whine when people put their logic into stress positions.
That led me to read this brilliant take down of torture by former military interrogator Matthew Alexander, which reminded me of the original brilliant take down of torture as an interrogation technique, "The Dark Art of Interrogation" by Mark Bowden that ran in The Atlantic Monthly in 2003.
Once again, with this whole Al-Qaeda 7 nonsense, we've re-entered the realm of not just arguing for torturing detainees, but also the with-us-or-against-us zone of equating people who don't agree with said torture as being terrorist sympathizers. That makes it seem like a good time to revive this post, which had been held in my archives against its will without any representation since 2006.
Interrogation for Dummies
From the creators of Classroom  Bias for Dummies and American  Foreign Policy for Dummies!
FOREWORD
by  Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
Hola, future interrogators!
I  am excited—so very  excited—that you are interested in learning more about  interrogation. Because the key to winning the War on Terror is  information, and most of the time, the only way to get reliable  information is to beat it out of someone.
However, as a society,  we also follow certain rules and regulations. . . especially  when the media are watching us! So to help make sure your next  Q&A doesn’t venture into too much S&M, we present this handy  guide. Read it, live it, and if necessary, rip the pages out and force  feed them to an uncooperative prisoner.
Good luck!
Calibrating your compassion
It is imperative  when conducting forceful interrogations to know where to draw the line.  The following quick comparisons will help you understand what is  considered acceptable behavior, and what is just barbaric.
Hooking  a Sears Die Hard battery to a detainee’s scrotum—acceptable
Unhooking  life support from a human vegetable—barbaric
Turning  prisoners over to countries that practice torture—acceptable
Turning  stem cells over to scientific researchers—barbaric
Ignoring  the Geneva Conventions—acceptable
Ignoring the Ten  Commandments—barbaric
Discarding the Fourth  Amendment during a time of war—acceptable
Obeying  the system of checks and balances in a time of war—barbaric
Smothering  a detainee in a sleeping bag—acceptable
Sharing  a sleeping bag with a naked cowboy—barbaric
Beating prisoners  with plastic cables—acceptable 
Exposing  children to plastic boobies on cable—barbaric
Forming  naked detainee pyramids—acceptable
Publishing  photos of naked detainee pyramids—barbaric
Lie detection checklist 
You’ve been at it for  hours with an interrogation and your subject still says he’s not Al  Queda. Can you believe him? Before you accept his gurgling pleas as  truth, follow this checklist.
Did you:
[ ] Attach  electrified nipple clamps?
[ ] Let dogs gnaw on detainee’s  appendages?
[ ] Rub  fake menstrual blood on detainee?
[ ] Sodomize detainee with a  glow stick?
[ ] Allow detainee to sit in a mound of his own feces?
[  ] Waterboard?
[  ] Cause sleep deprivation/suicidal tendencies by putting "Sister  Christian" on repeat?
If you’ve done all these steps and  still haven’t gotten a confession, congratulations, you’ve determined  that your detainee is innocent. Pat him on the back and tell him he's  free to walk away (or crawl back to freedom if his knees are broken).
Making your extraordinary renditions extraordinarily legal
One  of the keys to good interrogation is knowing when to ask for help.  That’s what extraordinary rendition is: asking a helpful partner in the  War on Terror to see if they can extract information from a prisoner.
Due  to the meddling of freedom-hating liberals, however, it is against the  law to hand prisoners over to countries that practice “torture.” Here’s  how you can make sure your rendition partner isn’t going to “torture”  the subject.
1) Ask  the representatives from the country if they torture prisoners 
2)  Check representatives for crossed fingers
3) Ask them again if they  torture prisoners, and this time make them swear on the religious book  of their choice
4) If yes, hand prisoner over
What to do if you are accused of torture
- Do not  admit fault
- Do not discuss the incident with journalists,  activists, tribunals, or anyone except your superior officer, the  Attorney General, or the Secretary of Defense
- Ask accuser to  define torture
- Acknowledge that said definition is only one of  many definitions of torture
- Remind accuser that enemies  regularly practice torture
- Ask accuser if he or she would like  to see the world ruled by a pro-torture Islamic caliphate
- Deny  that you are changing the subject
- Offer to show accuser just  how humane waterboarding is
- Find the lowest-ranking person  involved and blame everything on him or her
Congratulations!
That's  all the training you need to be a qualified interrogator. So grab your  digital camera and billy club and get ready to embark on an exciting  career in information extraction. And remember, your job isn't just to  get people to talk, it's also to keep people from talking about  what you're doing.
 
 
5 comments:
painful
The topic or the jokes? ;-)
Scott Horton:
In her speech, highly critical of the US’s conduct during the war on terror, the former secret service chief implied that the leadership in Washington was inspired by watching the TV espionage thriller 24. She said: “Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld certainly watched 24″. Dame Eliza said: “The Americans were very keen that people like us did not discover what they were doing.” She insisted that she had been unaware of what was going on until her retirement in 2007. One of her retrospective discoveries was the interrogation method used on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. When she asked her subordinates why the senior al-Qa’ida member was offering so much information, they told her he was “very proud of his achievements when questioned”. She added: “It wasn’t actually until after I retired that I read that he had been water-boarded 160 times.”
~
"American Foreign Policy for Dummies!" Is this what Sarah Palin referenced when she wrote all those notes on her hands?
painful yet funny. a combo the CIA itself works hard to achieve in its interrogations.
Post a Comment